Start / Blog / Methods / Document AI Evaluation Framework

Document AI Evaluation Framework

Summarize with ChatGPT

In this blog post, we will present an evaluation framework for Document AI which is carried out on three different levels: NER level (Named Entity Recognition), concept level and document level. We will illustrate this evaluation framework using an application example - the financial KIDs (Key Information Documents) - which contain various concepts such as issuers and assets.

Evaluation at NER level

In the evaluation of NER models the focus is on the accuracy of recognizing individual named entities such as persons, places or organizations. For our example of financial KIDs, named entities such as issuer names, locations or product names could be relevant.

AI Evaluation
  • Accuracy: The accuracy indicates how many of the recognized named entities are actually correct. A high accuracy value indicates that most of the recognized entities are correct.
  • False positive rate: The false positive rate shows how many of the detected entities were incorrectly identified as correct. A low value is desirable as false positive results should be avoided.
  • False negative rate: The false negative rate indicates how many actually existing entities were not recognized. A low false negative rate indicates that most of the relevant entities were recognized.

Evaluation at concept level

At the concept level, various named entities are combined into one concept, e.g. an issuer with first name, surname, date of birth, street, house number and zip code. In our example, concepts such as issuer data or asset details could be relevant.

  • Accuracy: The accuracy shows how many of the recognized concepts are correct, including all associated entities. A high accuracy value means that most of the recognized concepts are correct.
  • False positive rate: The false positive rate indicates how many of the recognized concepts were incorrectly identified as correct. A low value indicates that false positive results have been minimized.
  • False negative rate: The false negative rate shows how many of the concepts actually present were not recognized. A low false negative rate indicates that most of the relevant concepts were recognized.

Evaluation at document level

At the document level, all concepts with all correct entities must be found. If the score is 100 %, all documents can be processed fully automatically.

  • Accuracy: The accuracy indicates how many documents were processed correctly and all relevant concepts and entities were recognized. A high accuracy value means that most documents were processed correctly.
  • False positive rate: The false positive rate shows how many documents were incorrectly identified as correctly processed. A low value is desirable as false positive results should be avoided.
  • False negative rate: The false negative rate indicates how many documents were not processed correctly and relevant concepts or entities were not recognized. A low false negative rate indicates that most of the relevant information was successfully captured.

By applying this evaluation framework at different levels, we can comprehensively assess the performance of Document AI and ensure that all relevant information is captured correctly. This is crucial for automating document handling processes and ensuring their accuracy and efficiency.

Did you find this page helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

Would you give me feedback? (anonymous)

We develop AI software for companies and deliberately avoid annoying advertising banners. Through our articles, we document topics that occupy and interest us and also finance our daily bread.

As our content is free of charge, your feedback is our praise.

Each author reads your anonymous feedback personally, although AI could automate it, and integrates constructive suggestions directly into the next revision or uses it as inspiration for the next article.



    </article
    en_USEN